Date

Order no

That is the order given

Signature

11/03/2018

01

The complaint was filed in the complaint. Both parties were ordered to appear on the next date with the evidence of the dispute through notice. Date: 22/03/2018

                                        Signed

22/03/2018

02

The plaintiff appeared before the court. The defendant's average appearance date 29/03/2018.

                                         Signed

29/03/2018

03

The plaintiff appeared. The average of the defendant appeared. Next date dated 02/04/2018.

                                                                                       Signed

02/04/2018

04

The plaintiff appeared. The average of the defendants appeared The defendant does not appear in the court even after the notice of the defendant, and the notice of the defendant does not accept notice if he is at home to issue a notice to the village police. The court rejected the petition as the defendant did not accept the notice. Since the defendant did not appear, the Ward No 3 member Lutfar Rahman was ordered to submit the report before the court on 08/04/2018. Date: 09/04/2018

                                                                                    Signed

09/04/2018

০৫

Ward no 3 member Lutfar Rahman submitted the report and saw the plaintiff's complaint was reviewed. It is a fact that in the case of equer Mouza of Birakpur upazila under Dinajpur district, the total number of scandal with 2893 marks of 2893 was recorded by Rakdia owner Hassan Ullah Mondal. After obtaining possession, register 9462 registrar of 9462 on the sale of Abdus Sattar.Later, while Abdus Sattar Mondal was occupied in Khiraauda, ​​in the last S, A Recked period, in the Kharkandi of equer Mouza, the 66th century property of 2893 was rewritten in the name of Abdus Sattar Mondal. When Abdus Sattar Mondal proposed to sell his property, he passed the possession of Akkas Ali Sardar on 25/12/1964 commemorating the purchase of the property and transmitted the copy of the closing of the 76125 on the last 30/12/1964 to the possession of the possession.Then Akkas Ali, while enjoying the possession, transferred the document dated 10/05/1965, along with M Mansur Ali, and removed the occupation. In the possession of the accused property Mansur Ali, the owner of the property, in the possession of the accused, Murshida Begum, on 02/11/2011, 5051 no. Disclaimer of property by his own name, the loyalty whose case lX-l / 1075 / 11-12, Khatian No. 816 and Ownership in possession of the current field survey, and Khyatian DPP 1188 was properly published and circulated in the name of Badir, and the plaintiff practiced Paddy Rabi till date. On the other side, the defendant party has never grab the property of the complaining property. The defendant is trying to destroy the crops of complaining property. The case was registered in absence of the defendants after repeated notice. The plaintiff was advised to be a witness to the High Court

                                                                    Signed